AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
California edd12/18/2022 ![]() ![]() ![]() The single payer proposal especially offended current Medicare subscribers, who benefit from a system long opposed by Republicans – but embraced even by them in recent years because it works. If the state could not safeguard unemployment insurance dollars paid in by many thousands of employers, why would anyone think it capable of handling far more money paid in by tens of millions of individuals? No one said so, but one of the main reasons was the EDD debacle. So Kalra’s bill died, at least for this year, without any vote taken, and without many politicians forced to take positions for which they could be held responsible. That was largely because many Assembly Democrats didn’t want to be forced to go on the record for or against single payer, especially in an election year when some will face new constituents during the June and November votes. Gavin Newsom through Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon and state Senate President Toni Atkins of San Diego, all have long backed the single payer idea. Kalra’s bill went nowhere despite the fact that the extreme liberal Democratic politicians who now run Sacramento, from Gov. It did not say where the money for this would come from. Just how difficult this financing would have been to acquire was demonstrated when Kalra’s AB 1400 spelled out what single payer would do and what it would be – essentially Medicare for all, with no more insurance company involvement and no more distinction between Medi-Cal patients and everyone else. But that still would have left many billions to be raised, presumably by the largest tax increase in state history. Some would have come from money given California by the federal Medicaid system, known here as Medi-Cal. Some of that money would have come from redirected health insurance premiums, both for private insurance and for Medicare – if the federal Medicare system would agree to giving up more than 10 percent of its cash flow. This year’s proposal, carried by Democratic Assemblyman Ash Kalra of San Jose, would have entailed an annual expense of close to $400 billion, well in excess of California’s general fund budget. Yes, the EDD has clawed back a few billion of the dollars that went to fake claimants all over the world.īut its demonstrable incompetence under three different department directors causes millions of Californians to wonder why anyone should entrust massive sums of money to the state for distribution to legitimate claimants.Īnd make no mistake about single payer: It would involve sums far larger even than the approximately $180 billion passed out by EDD over the first year and a half of the pandemic. ![]() But it was woefully unprepared for the many fraud schemes brought to bear against its funds during that most fraught of times. Yes, the EDD was flooded with claims in that time of massive layoffs. No program in state, city or local government has shown itself less competent over the last few years than the state Employment Development Department’s unemployment insurance system, which lost a reported $20 billion to fraudulent claims during the first 18 months or so of the coronavirus pandemic. It takes only three letters to explain why the idea of single payer health insurance keeps getting shot down quickly in the California Legislature: EDD. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |